Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/cml: Add second PCH ID for CMP

2019-10-09 Thread James Ausmus
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 01:00:07PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 10:29:43AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 10:03:31AM +0300, Timo Aaltonen wrote: > > > On 17.9.2019 2.32, Matt Roper wrote: > > > > The CMP PCH ID we have in the driver is correct for the C

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/cml: Add second PCH ID for CMP

2019-10-09 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 10:29:43AM -0700, Matt Roper wrote: > On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 10:03:31AM +0300, Timo Aaltonen wrote: > > On 17.9.2019 2.32, Matt Roper wrote: > > > The CMP PCH ID we have in the driver is correct for the CML-U machines we > > > have > > > in our CI system, but the CML-S and

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/cml: Add second PCH ID for CMP

2019-10-09 Thread Matt Roper
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 10:03:31AM +0300, Timo Aaltonen wrote: > On 17.9.2019 2.32, Matt Roper wrote: > > The CMP PCH ID we have in the driver is correct for the CML-U machines we > > have > > in our CI system, but the CML-S and CML-H CI machines appear to use a > > different PCH ID, leading our d

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/cml: Add second PCH ID for CMP

2019-10-09 Thread Timo Aaltonen
On 17.9.2019 2.32, Matt Roper wrote: > The CMP PCH ID we have in the driver is correct for the CML-U machines we have > in our CI system, but the CML-S and CML-H CI machines appear to use a > different PCH ID, leading our driver to detect no PCH for them. > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi > Cc: Anusha Srivats

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/cml: Add second PCH ID for CMP

2019-09-18 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Matt Roper (2019-09-17 00:32:51) > The CMP PCH ID we have in the driver is correct for the CML-U machines we have > in our CI system, but the CML-S and CML-H CI machines appear to use a > different PCH ID, leading our driver to detect no PCH for them. > > Cc: Rodrigo Vivi > Cc: Anusha Sri

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/cml: Add second PCH ID for CMP

2019-09-17 Thread Matt Roper
o: Lucas De Marchi > > Cc: Intel Graphics > > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/cml: Add second PCH ID for CMP > > > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 05:26:10PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 4:33 PM Matt Roper > > wro

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/cml: Add second PCH ID for CMP

2019-09-16 Thread Saarinen, Jani
HI, > -Original Message- > From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of > Matt > Roper > Sent: tiistai 17. syyskuuta 2019 3.35 > To: Lucas De Marchi > Cc: Intel Graphics > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/cml: Add secon

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/cml: Add second PCH ID for CMP

2019-09-16 Thread Matt Roper
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 05:26:10PM -0700, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 4:33 PM Matt Roper wrote: > > > > The CMP PCH ID we have in the driver is correct for the CML-U machines we > > have > > in our CI system, but the CML-S and CML-H CI machines appear to use a > > CML-S is b

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/cml: Add second PCH ID for CMP

2019-09-16 Thread Lucas De Marchi
On Mon, Sep 16, 2019 at 4:33 PM Matt Roper wrote: > > The CMP PCH ID we have in the driver is correct for the CML-U machines we have > in our CI system, but the CML-S and CML-H CI machines appear to use a CML-S is back to life, but CML-H is still failing. Is CML-H actually using the same PCH? Lu

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/cml: Add second PCH ID for CMP

2019-09-16 Thread Matt Roper
The CMP PCH ID we have in the driver is correct for the CML-U machines we have in our CI system, but the CML-S and CML-H CI machines appear to use a different PCH ID, leading our driver to detect no PCH for them. Cc: Rodrigo Vivi Cc: Anusha Srivatsa References: 729ae330a0f2e2 ("drm/i915/cml: Int