[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/crt: Only support DPMS On/Off with the PCH registers

2012-04-10 Thread Chris Wilson
As part of the PCH split, the ability to control CRT standby/suspend states was defeatured; the bits are now marked reserved and apparently have no effect. Reported-by: Ouping Zhang Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=48491 Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/crt: Only support DPMS On/Off with the PCH registers

2012-04-10 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Apr 10, 2012 at 09:35:30AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > As part of the PCH split, the ability to control CRT standby/suspend > states was defeatured; the bits are now marked reserved and apparently > have no effect. > > Reported-by: Ouping Zhang > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/sh

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/crt: Only support DPMS On/Off with the PCH registers

2012-04-10 Thread Adam Jackson
On 4/10/12 4:35 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: As part of the PCH split, the ability to control CRT standby/suspend states was defeatured; the bits are now marked reserved and apparently have no effect. Are the intermediate states even tested? I have vague memories of them not working. I'd be just

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/crt: Only support DPMS On/Off with the PCH registers

2012-04-10 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:20:38 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > On 4/10/12 4:35 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > > As part of the PCH split, the ability to control CRT standby/suspend > > states was defeatured; the bits are now marked reserved and apparently > > have no effect. > > Are the intermediate states

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/crt: Only support DPMS On/Off with the PCH registers

2012-04-10 Thread Keith Packard
<#part sign=pgpmime> On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 09:20:38 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote: > On 4/10/12 4:35 AM, Chris Wilson wrote: > > As part of the PCH split, the ability to control CRT standby/suspend > > states was defeatured; the bits are now marked reserved and apparently > > have no effect. > > Are th