[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/execlists: Always force a context reload when rewinding RING_TAIL

2020-02-07 Thread Chris Wilson
If we rewind the RING_TAIL on a context, due to a preemption event, we must force the context restore for the RING_TAIL update to be properly handled. Rather than note which preemption events may cause us to rewind the tail, compare the new request's tail with the previously submitted RING_TAIL, as

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/execlists: Always force a context reload when rewinding RING_TAIL

2020-02-07 Thread Chris Wilson
If we rewind the RING_TAIL on a context, due to a preemption event, we must force the context restore for the RING_TAIL update to be properly handled. Rather than note which preemption events may cause us to rewind the tail, compare the new request's tail with the previously submitted RING_TAIL, as

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/execlists: Always force a context reload when rewinding RING_TAIL

2020-02-07 Thread Chris Wilson
If we rewind the RING_TAIL on a context, due to a preemption event, we must force the context restore for the RING_TAIL update to be properly handled. Rather than note which preemption events may cause us to rewind the tail, compare the new request's tail with the previously submitted RING_TAIL, as

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/execlists: Always force a context reload when rewinding RING_TAIL

2020-02-10 Thread Sasha Levin
Hi, [This is an automated email] This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag, fixing commit: 8ee36e048c98 ("drm/i915/execlists: Minimalistic timeslicing"). The bot has tested the following trees: v5.5.2, v5.4.18. v5.5.2: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 05975cd9