Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gen9: fix DDB partitioning for multi-screen cases

2016-10-07 Thread Lyude
Sorry about how long this took! Anyway, finally got to testing it Reviewed-by: Lyude On Tue, 2016-10-04 at 14:37 -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote: > With the previous code we were only recomputing the DDB partitioning > for the CRTCs included in the atomic commit, so any other active

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gen9: fix DDB partitioning for multi-screen cases

2016-10-06 Thread Maarten Lankhorst
Op 04-10-16 om 19:44 schreef Paulo Zanoni: > Em Ter, 2016-10-04 às 14:37 -0300, Paulo Zanoni escreveu: >> With the previous code we were only recomputing the DDB partitioning >> for the CRTCs included in the atomic commit, so any other active >> CRTCs >> would end up having their DDB registers

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gen9: fix DDB partitioning for multi-screen cases

2016-10-04 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Em Ter, 2016-10-04 às 14:37 -0300, Paulo Zanoni escreveu: > With the previous code we were only recomputing the DDB partitioning > for the CRTCs included in the atomic commit, so any other active > CRTCs > would end up having their DDB registers zeroed. In this patch we make > sure that the

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/gen9: fix DDB partitioning for multi-screen cases

2016-10-04 Thread Paulo Zanoni
With the previous code we were only recomputing the DDB partitioning for the CRTCs included in the atomic commit, so any other active CRTCs would end up having their DDB registers zeroed. In this patch we make sure that the computed state starts as a copy of the current partitioning, and then we