Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Apply min softlimit correctly

On Fri, 09 Jun 2023 15:02:52 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote: > Hi Vinay, > We were skipping when min_softlimit was equal to RPn. We need to apply > it rergardless as efficient frequency will push the SLPC min to RPe. > This will break scenarios where user sets a min softlimit < RPe before > reset

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Apply min softlimit correctly

On 6/13/2023 7:25 PM, Dixit, Ashutosh wrote: On Fri, 09 Jun 2023 15:02:52 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote: Hi Vinay, We were skipping when min_softlimit was equal to RPn. We need to apply it rergardless as efficient frequency will push the SLPC min to RPe. regardless This will break

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Apply min softlimit correctly

On Fri, 09 Jun 2023 15:02:52 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote: > Hi Vinay, > We were skipping when min_softlimit was equal to RPn. We need to apply > it rergardless as efficient frequency will push the SLPC min to RPe. regardless > This will break scenarios where user sets a min softlimit < RPe

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/guc/slpc: Apply min softlimit correctly

We were skipping when min_softlimit was equal to RPn. We need to apply it rergardless as efficient frequency will push the SLPC min to RPe. This will break scenarios where user sets a min softlimit < RPe before reset and then performs a GT reset. Fixes: 95ccf312a1e4 ("drm/i915/guc/slpc: Allow