Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/hdcp: add intel_atomic_state argument to hdcp_enable function

2023-05-10 Thread Kandpal, Suraj
> On Thu, 04 May 2023, Suraj Kandpal wrote: > > Since topology state is being added to drm_atomic_state now all > > drm_modeset_lock required are being taken from core this raises an > > issue when we try to loop over connector and assign vcpi id to our > > streams as we did not have atomic state

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/hdcp: add intel_atomic_state argument to hdcp_enable function

2023-05-10 Thread Jani Nikula
On Thu, 04 May 2023, Suraj Kandpal wrote: > Since topology state is being added to drm_atomic_state now all > drm_modeset_lock required are being taken from core this raises > an issue when we try to loop over connector and assign vcpi id to > our streams as we did not have atomic state to derive

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/hdcp: add intel_atomic_state argument to hdcp_enable function

2023-05-03 Thread Suraj Kandpal
Since topology state is being added to drm_atomic_state now all drm_modeset_lock required are being taken from core this raises an issue when we try to loop over connector and assign vcpi id to our streams as we did not have atomic state to derive acquire_ctx from hence we fill in stream info if dp