On 31/08/2018 17:52, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
On 31/08/2018 12:53, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
There are two issues with the current RPCS programming for Icelake:
Expansion of the slice count bitfield has been missed, as well as the
required programming workaround for the
On 31/08/2018 12:53, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
There are two issues with the current RPCS programming for Icelake:
Expansion of the slice count bitfield has been missed, as well as the
required programming workaround for the subslice count bitfield size
limitation.
1)
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
There are two issues with the current RPCS programming for Icelake:
Expansion of the slice count bitfield has been missed, as well as the
required programming workaround for the subslice count bitfield size
limitation.
1)
Bitfield width for configuring the active slice
