On 11/11/2019 12:05, Chris Wilson wrote:
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2019-11-11 09:53:08)
The ordering of the checks in the existing code can lead to holding
preemption not being considered as privileged op.
Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin
Fixes: 9cd20ef7803c ("drm/i915/perf: allow holding pre
Quoting Lionel Landwerlin (2019-11-11 09:53:08)
> The ordering of the checks in the existing code can lead to holding
> preemption not being considered as privileged op.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin
> Fixes: 9cd20ef7803c ("drm/i915/perf: allow holding preemption on filtered
> ctx")
Oops
The ordering of the checks in the existing code can lead to holding
preemption not being considered as privileged op.
Signed-off-by: Lionel Landwerlin
Fixes: 9cd20ef7803c ("drm/i915/perf: allow holding preemption on filtered ctx")
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_perf.c | 20 ++--
1
