Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/rkl: Remove require_force_probe protection

2021-02-08 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 11:43:13AM +, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Tejas Upadhyay (2020-11-30 12:48:55) > > Removing force probe protection from RKL platform. Did > > not observe warnings, errors, flickering or any visual > > defects while doing ordinary tasks like browsing and > > editing doc

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/rkl: Remove require_force_probe protection

2021-02-03 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Tejas Upadhyay (2020-11-30 12:48:55) > Removing force probe protection from RKL platform. Did > not observe warnings, errors, flickering or any visual > defects while doing ordinary tasks like browsing and > editing documents in a two monitor setup. > > Signed-off-by: Tejas Upadhyay We n

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/rkl: Remove require_force_probe protection

2021-01-27 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Pandey, Hariom (2021-01-27 15:10:53) > Hi Chris, > > (i) To your concern on the GPU dying issue gitlab#2743 --> this issue has > been resolved and not observed in last 3 runs --> The gitlab had been updated > with the pass results and closed. > (ii) RocketLate platform has been setup in

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/rkl: Remove require_force_probe protection

2021-01-27 Thread Pandey, Hariom
Chris Wilson > Sent: Friday, December 4, 2020 3:23 PM > To: Kattamanchi, JaswanthX ; Pandey, > Hariom ; Surendrakumar Upadhyay, > TejaskumarX ; intel- > g...@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: Naramasetti, LaxminarayanaX > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/rkl: Remove require_

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/rkl: Remove require_force_probe protection

2020-12-07 Thread Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX
amasetti, LaxminarayanaX > Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/rkl: Remove require_force_probe > protection > > Hi Tejas, > > As per your request triggered resume run on RKL CI machine, the testcases > which chris mentioned were passing with this run, Please find th

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/rkl: Remove require_force_probe protection

2020-12-04 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Kattamanchi, JaswanthX (2020-12-04 09:41:17) > Hi Tejas, > > As per your request triggered resume run on RKL CI machine, the testcases > which chris mentioned were passing with this run, Please find the below logs > for your reference It is not particular to a testcase. HW failure rare

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/rkl: Remove require_force_probe protection

2020-12-04 Thread Kattamanchi, JaswanthX
protection + Jaswant > -Original Message- > From: Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX > Sent: 03 December 2020 09:44 > To: Chris Wilson ; Pandey, Hariom > ; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/rkl: Remove > require_force_probe prote

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/rkl: Remove require_force_probe protection

2020-12-03 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX (2020-12-03 04:13:57) > Hi Jaswant, > > Can you please re-run resume run on CI as well as local setup and share > results here? If it passes in full resume run in either of setup we are good > go with. Acknowledge the bug as a critical failure [it is

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/rkl: Remove require_force_probe protection

2020-12-03 Thread Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX
+ Jaswant > -Original Message- > From: Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX > Sent: 03 December 2020 09:44 > To: Chris Wilson ; Pandey, Hariom > ; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/rkl: Remove require_force_probe > prote

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/rkl: Remove require_force_probe protection

2020-12-02 Thread Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX
ndey, Hariom ; Surendrakumar > Upadhyay, TejaskumarX > ; intel- > g...@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/rkl: Remove require_force_probe > protection > > Quoting Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX (2020-11-30 14:45:14) > > Hi Chris, > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/rkl: Remove require_force_probe protection

2020-11-30 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX (2020-11-30 14:45:14) > Hi Chris, > > The failing test was not part of BAT run, it ran in CI resume run and failed > there, however on manual run the same test got passed. Please find attached > results. One pass versus a major failure is not satisfac

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/rkl: Remove require_force_probe protection

2020-11-30 Thread Surendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX
urendrakumar Upadhyay, TejaskumarX > ; Pandey, Hariom > ; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/rkl: Remove require_force_probe > protection > > Quoting Tejas Upadhyay (2020-11-30 12:48:55) > > Removing force probe protection from RKL pl

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/rkl: Remove require_force_probe protection

2020-11-30 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Tejas Upadhyay (2020-11-30 12:48:55) > Removing force probe protection from RKL platform. Did > not observe warnings, errors, flickering or any visual > defects while doing ordinary tasks like browsing and > editing documents in a two monitor setup. Really? CI says differently. https://git

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/rkl: Remove require_force_probe protection

2020-11-30 Thread Tejas Upadhyay
Removing force probe protection from RKL platform. Did not observe warnings, errors, flickering or any visual defects while doing ordinary tasks like browsing and editing documents in a two monitor setup. Signed-off-by: Tejas Upadhyay --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_pci.c | 1 - 1 file changed, 1