On Mon, Mar 09, 2015 at 08:18:05AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On 03/09/2015 02:03 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 12:09:08AM +, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> >> On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 03:53:32PM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> >>> So try to enumerate eDP unconditionally in those
On 03/09/2015 02:03 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 12:09:08AM +, Damien Lespiau wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 03:53:32PM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
>>> So try to enumerate eDP unconditionally in those cases.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes
>>
>> That's WaIgnoreDDIAS
On Sat, Mar 07, 2015 at 12:09:08AM +, Damien Lespiau wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 03:53:32PM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > So try to enumerate eDP unconditionally in those cases.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes
>
> That's WaIgnoreDDIAStrap, I assumed it actually worked since my eDP
Tested-By: PRC QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact:
shuang...@intel.com)
Task id: 5909
-Summary-
Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied
PNV -5 275/275
On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 03:53:32PM -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> So try to enumerate eDP unconditionally in those cases.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes
That's WaIgnoreDDIAStrap, I assumed it actually worked since my eDP
panel was detected... I see it listed without a stepping check but I
guess y
So try to enumerate eDP unconditionally in those cases.
Signed-off-by: Jesse Barnes
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c | 9 +++--
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c
index 597c10b..88
