,
Terrence
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/vgpu: Neuter forcewakes for VGPU
more thouroughly
Hi,
On 13/03/2017 09:37, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
On 2017.03.13 09:26:26 +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 10/03/2017 10:09, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 09:57:47AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin
>Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/vgpu: Neuter forcewakes for VGPU
>more thouroughly
>
>
>Hi,
>
>On 13/03/2017 09:37, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
>> On 2017.03.13 09:26:26 +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>>>
>>> On 10/03/2017 10:09, Chris Wilson wrote:
>>&g
Hi,
On 13/03/2017 09:37, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
On 2017.03.13 09:26:26 +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 10/03/2017 10:09, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 09:57:47AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
If we avoid initializing forcewake domains when running as
a guest,
On Mon, Mar 13, 2017 at 09:47:15AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 13/03/2017 09:37, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
> >On 2017.03.13 09:26:26 +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> >>
> >>On 10/03/2017 10:09, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >>>On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 09:57:47AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> From: Tvrt
On 13/03/2017 09:37, Zhenyu Wang wrote:
On 2017.03.13 09:26:26 +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 10/03/2017 10:09, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 09:57:47AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
If we avoid initializing forcewake domains when running as
a guest, and
On 2017.03.13 09:26:26 +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 10/03/2017 10:09, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 09:57:47AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> > > From: Tvrtko Ursulin
> > >
> > > If we avoid initializing forcewake domains when running as
> > > a guest, and also use gen2
On 10/03/2017 10:09, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 09:57:47AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
If we avoid initializing forcewake domains when running as
a guest, and also use gen2 mmio accessors in that case, we
can avoid the timer traffic and any looping throu
Chris Wilson writes:
> On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 09:57:47AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>> From: Tvrtko Ursulin
>>
>> If we avoid initializing forcewake domains when running as
>> a guest, and also use gen2 mmio accessors in that case, we
>> can avoid the timer traffic and any looping through th
On Fri, Mar 10, 2017 at 09:57:47AM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> From: Tvrtko Ursulin
>
> If we avoid initializing forcewake domains when running as
> a guest, and also use gen2 mmio accessors in that case, we
> can avoid the timer traffic and any looping through the
> forcewake code which is cu
From: Tvrtko Ursulin
If we avoid initializing forcewake domains when running as
a guest, and also use gen2 mmio accessors in that case, we
can avoid the timer traffic and any looping through the
forcewake code which is currently just so it can end up in
the no-op forcewake implementation.
Signed
10 matches
Mail list logo
