gt; To: Ville Syrjälä
> > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/vlv: assert and de-assert sideband
> > reset on resume
> >
> > On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 21:10:21 +0300
> > Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Apr 11
; > To: Ville Syrjälä
> > Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/vlv: assert and de-assert sideband
> > reset on resume
> >
> > On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 21:10:21 +0300
> > Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> >
> > > On Fr
> -Original Message-
> From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf Of
> Jesse Barnes
> Sent: Friday, April 11, 2014 11:46 PM
> To: Ville Syrjälä
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915/vlv:
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 21:06:31 +0300
Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:34:19AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 19:16:32 +0200
> > Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:00:16AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > > This is a bit like the CMN rese
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 21:10:21 +0300
Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:35:40AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 20:26:24 +0300
> > Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> >
> > > On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:00:16AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > > This is a bit like the CMN rese
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:35:40AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 20:26:24 +0300
> Ville Syrjälä wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:00:16AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > This is a bit like the CMN reset de-assert we do in DPIO_CTL, except
> > > that it resets the whole c
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:34:19AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 19:16:32 +0200
> Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:00:16AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > > This is a bit like the CMN reset de-assert we do in DPIO_CTL, except
> > > that it resets the whole c
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 20:26:24 +0300
Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:00:16AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > This is a bit like the CMN reset de-assert we do in DPIO_CTL, except
> > that it resets the whole common lane section of the PHY. This is
> > required on machines where the
On Fri, 11 Apr 2014 19:16:32 +0200
Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:00:16AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> > This is a bit like the CMN reset de-assert we do in DPIO_CTL, except
> > that it resets the whole common lane section of the PHY. This is
> > required on machines where the
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:00:16AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> This is a bit like the CMN reset de-assert we do in DPIO_CTL, except
> that it resets the whole common lane section of the PHY. This is
> required on machines where the BIOS doesn't do this for us on resume to
> properly re-calibrate
On Fri, 2014-04-11 at 10:00 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> This is a bit like the CMN reset de-assert we do in DPIO_CTL, except
> that it resets the whole common lane section of the PHY. This is
> required on machines where the BIOS doesn't do this for us on resume to
> properly re-calibrate and get
On Fri, Apr 11, 2014 at 10:00:16AM -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote:
> This is a bit like the CMN reset de-assert we do in DPIO_CTL, except
> that it resets the whole common lane section of the PHY. This is
> required on machines where the BIOS doesn't do this for us on resume to
> properly re-calibrate
This is a bit like the CMN reset de-assert we do in DPIO_CTL, except
that it resets the whole common lane section of the PHY. This is
required on machines where the BIOS doesn't do this for us on resume to
properly re-calibrate and get the PHY ready to transmit data.
Without this patch, such mach
13 matches
Mail list logo