On Thu, 11 Feb 2016, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> intel_digital_port_connected() lacks one 'else'. There's no
> actual harm in not having it since each branch has an unconditional
> return, so it can't accidentally end up in taking two branches instead
> of just t
From: Ville Syrjälä
intel_digital_port_connected() lacks one 'else'. There's no
actual harm in not having it since each branch has an unconditional
return, so it can't accidentally end up in taking two branches instead
of just the one. But let's be consistent and add the 'else' anyway.
Signed-of
