Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Allow full PPGTT with param override

2014-03-25 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 06:06:00PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: When PPGTT was disabled by default, the patch also prevented the user from overriding this behavior via module parameter. Being able to test this on arbitrary kernels is extremely beneficial to track down the remaining bugs. The

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Allow full PPGTT with param override

2014-03-25 Thread Ben Widawsky
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 10:46:12AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 06:06:00PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: When PPGTT was disabled by default, the patch also prevented the user from overriding this behavior via module parameter. Being able to test this on arbitrary kernels

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Allow full PPGTT with param override

2014-03-25 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 5:42 PM, Ben Widawsky b...@bwidawsk.net wrote: My apologies for breaking this a bit harder than intended, and thanks for fixing it up. Patch merged to dinq. -Daniel No harm, no foul. FWIW QA had been reported 0 PPGTT regressions for the last week or so. Score one for

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Allow full PPGTT with param override

2014-03-24 Thread Ben Widawsky
When PPGTT was disabled by default, the patch also prevented the user from overriding this behavior via module parameter. Being able to test this on arbitrary kernels is extremely beneficial to track down the remaining bugs. The patch that prevented this was: commit