Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Also discard second CRC on gen8+ platforms.

2017-09-28 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Thu, Sep 28, 2017 at 08:09:43AM +, Mika Kahola wrote: > This fixes my issue with GLK+MIPI/DSI when running IGT test > > kms_frontbuffer_tracking --r basic > > Tested-by: Mika Kahola Thanks for spotting the problem, for reviews and testings. Patch merged to dinq.

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Also discard second CRC on gen8+ platforms.

2017-09-28 Thread Mika Kahola
On Wed, 2017-09-27 at 17:20 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > One of the differences I spotted for GEN8+ platforms when > compared to older platforms is that spec for BDW+ includes > this sentence: > > "The first CRC done indication after CRC is first enabled is > from only a partial frame, so it will

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Also discard second CRC on gen8+ platforms.

2017-09-28 Thread Mika Kahola
This fixes my issue with GLK+MIPI/DSI when running IGT test kms_frontbuffer_tracking --r basic Tested-by: Mika Kahola On Wed, 2017-09-27 at 17:20 -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > One of the differences I spotted for GEN8+ platforms when > compared to older platforms is that

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Also discard second CRC on gen8+ platforms.

2017-09-27 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
One of the differences I spotted for GEN8+ platforms when compared to older platforms is that spec for BDW+ includes this sentence: "The first CRC done indication after CRC is first enabled is from only a partial frame, so it will not have the expected CRC result." This is an indication that on