Quoting Tvrtko Ursulin (2017-06-29 15:50:17)
>
> On 29/06/2017 14:49, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > When computing a hash for looking up relcoation target handles in an
> > execbuf, we start with a large size for the hashtable and proceed to
> > reduce it until the allocation suceeds. The final attempt
On 29/06/2017 14:49, Chris Wilson wrote:
When computing a hash for looking up relcoation target handles in an
execbuf, we start with a large size for the hashtable and proceed to
reduce it until the allocation suceeds. The final attempt is with an
order of 0 (i.e. a single element). This means
When computing a hash for looking up relcoation target handles in an
execbuf, we start with a large size for the hashtable and proceed to
reduce it until the allocation suceeds. The final attempt is with an
order of 0 (i.e. a single element). This means that we then pass bits=0
to hash_32() which
