Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Bump priority of clean up work

2018-08-13 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Mika Kuoppala (2018-08-13 13:49:43) > Chris Wilson writes: > > > Quoting Chris Wilson (2018-07-12 12:57:29) > >> We require that we keep the list of outstanding work short so that we do > >> not "leak" memory while pageflipping under stress. However that system > >> stress may delay kerne

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Bump priority of clean up work

2018-08-13 Thread Mika Kuoppala
Chris Wilson writes: > Quoting Chris Wilson (2018-07-12 12:57:29) >> We require that we keep the list of outstanding work short so that we do >> not "leak" memory while pageflipping under stress. However that system >> stress may delay kernel workers virtually indefinitely, which incurs the >> pa

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Bump priority of clean up work

2018-08-13 Thread Chris Wilson
Quoting Chris Wilson (2018-07-12 12:57:29) > We require that we keep the list of outstanding work short so that we do > not "leak" memory while pageflipping under stress. However that system > stress may delay kernel workers virtually indefinitely, which incurs the > pageflips stall and eventually

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Bump priority of clean up work

2018-07-12 Thread Chris Wilson
We require that we keep the list of outstanding work short so that we do not "leak" memory while pageflipping under stress. However that system stress may delay kernel workers virtually indefinitely, which incurs the pageflips stall and eventually hit a timeout waiting for the cleanup. Try to comb