On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 04:36:38PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
I don't think anyone should be poking at crtc-fb w/o holding the crtc
mutex. Except that intel_update_fbc() actually does. That thing would
appear to be just broken since it crawls around in the crtc state w/o
proper protection.
From: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
Point crtc-fb the the new framebuffer only after we know that the flip
was succesfully queued.
While at it, move the intel_fb and obj assignments a bit close to where
they're used.
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com writes:
From: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
Point crtc-fb the the new framebuffer only after we know that the flip
was succesfully queued.
While at it, move the intel_fb and obj assignments a bit close to where
they're used.
Cc:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 01:31:35PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 02:17:24PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
Point crtc-fb the the new framebuffer only after we know that the flip
was succesfully queued.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 04:36:38PM +0200, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 01:31:35PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 02:17:24PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
wrote:
From: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
Point crtc-fb the the new
