Extend the same reasoning as in the patch listed below.  It's not an
error for the workaround list to be empty if no workarounds are needed.

    commit 02235808b61cd9382d224b0df263193006dd9913
    Author: Francisco Jerez <curroje...@riseup.net>
    Date:   Wed Oct 7 14:44:01 2015 +0300
        drm/i915: Don't warn if the workaround list is empty.

Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.v...@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Wayne Boyer <wayne.bo...@intel.com>
---
 drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
index 06180dc..b46e6af 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_lrc.c
@@ -1082,7 +1082,7 @@ static int intel_logical_ring_workarounds_emit(struct 
drm_i915_gem_request *req)
        struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
        struct i915_workarounds *w = &dev_priv->workarounds;
 
-       if (WARN_ON_ONCE(w->count == 0))
+       if (w->count == 0)
                return 0;
 
        ring->gpu_caches_dirty = true;
-- 
1.9.1

_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx

Reply via email to