On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 08:26:27AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Feb 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 07:59:05PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com
> > wrote:
> >> From: Ville Syrjälä
> >>
> >> Looks like g4x hpd live status bits actually agree with the spec. At
On Thu, 11 Feb 2016, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 07:59:05PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
>> From: Ville Syrjälä
>>
>> Looks like g4x hpd live status bits actually agree with the spec. At
>> least they do on the machine I have, and apparently on Nick Bowler's
>>
On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 07:59:05PM +0200, ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Ville Syrjälä
>
> Looks like g4x hpd live status bits actually agree with the spec. At
> least they do on the machine I have, and apparently on Nick Bowler's
> g4x as well.
>
> So gm45 may be the only platform
From: Ville Syrjälä
Looks like g4x hpd live status bits actually agree with the spec. At
least they do on the machine I have, and apparently on Nick Bowler's
g4x as well.
So gm45 may be the only platform where they don't agree. At least
that seems to be the case based on the (somewhat incomplete
