Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix initial pipe underrun state tracking

2014-03-24 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 02:05:37PM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Mon, 24 Mar 2014, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 10:22:59AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > >> On Mon, 24 Mar 2014, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >> > Since > >> > > >> > commit 5c673b60a9b3b23486f4eda75c72e91d31d26a2b > >>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix initial pipe underrun state tracking

2014-03-24 Thread Jani Nikula
On Mon, 24 Mar 2014, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 10:22:59AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Mon, 24 Mar 2014, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> > Since >> > >> > commit 5c673b60a9b3b23486f4eda75c72e91d31d26a2b >> > Author: Daniel Vetter >> > Date: Fri Mar 7 20:34:46 2014 +0100 >> > >>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix initial pipe underrun state tracking

2014-03-24 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Mar 24, 2014 at 10:22:59AM +0200, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Mon, 24 Mar 2014, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Since > > > > commit 5c673b60a9b3b23486f4eda75c72e91d31d26a2b > > Author: Daniel Vetter > > Date: Fri Mar 7 20:34:46 2014 +0100 > > > > drm/i915: Don't enable display error interrupt

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix initial pipe underrun state tracking

2014-03-24 Thread Jani Nikula
On Mon, 24 Mar 2014, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Since > > commit 5c673b60a9b3b23486f4eda75c72e91d31d26a2b > Author: Daniel Vetter > Date: Fri Mar 7 20:34:46 2014 +0100 > > drm/i915: Don't enable display error interrupts from the start > > we don't enable underrun interrupts any more at takeover

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Fix initial pipe underrun state tracking

2014-03-23 Thread Daniel Vetter
Since commit 5c673b60a9b3b23486f4eda75c72e91d31d26a2b Author: Daniel Vetter Date: Fri Mar 7 20:34:46 2014 +0100 drm/i915: Don't enable display error interrupts from the start we don't enable underrun interrupts any more at takeover time. Unfortunately I've forgotten to also adjust the sw-