On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 09:30:34PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> The active output is only the currently selected one, which does not
> imply that it's actually enabled. Since we don't use the sdvo encoder
> side dpms support, we need to check whether the chip-side sdvo port is
> enabled instead.
>
The active output is only the currently selected one, which does not
imply that it's actually enabled. Since we don't use the sdvo encoder
side dpms support, we need to check whether the chip-side sdvo port is
enabled instead.
v2: Fix up Bugzilla links.
v3: Simplify logic a bit (Chris).
Bugzilla
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 06:39:37PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> The active output is only the currently selected one, which does not
> imply that it's actually enabled. Since we don't use the sdvo encoder
> side dpms support, we need to check whether the chip-side sdvo port is
> enabled instead.
>
The active output is only the currently selected one, which does not
imply that it's actually enabled. Since we don't use the sdvo encoder
side dpms support, we need to check whether the chip-side sdvo port is
enabled instead.
v2: Fix up Bugzilla links.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show
The active output is only the currently selected one, which does not
imply that it's actually enabled. Since we don't use the sdvo encoder
side dpms support, we need to check whether the chip-side sdvo port is
enabled instead.
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60138
Bugzilla:
