On Tue, 2018-01-30 at 16:44 +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> This is a precautionary measure as I have no evidence to suggest we've
> hit a bug here (I was hoping this might explain gdg's odd behaviour, but
> alas), but given that we have a function to flush the ggtt writes it
> seems prudent to use
This is a precautionary measure as I have no evidence to suggest we've
hit a bug here (I was hoping this might explain gdg's odd behaviour, but
alas), but given that we have a function to flush the ggtt writes it
seems prudent to use it prior to changing the fence register. Due to the
intrinsic
