Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Officially give up on seqno coherency

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 01:52:27PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 01:05:41PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > > On Fri, 19 Jun 2015, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > We've never figured out the magic trick to make irq vs. seqno > > > updates coherent, only tricks to make it work. And s

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Officially give up on seqno coherency

On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 01:05:41PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Fri, 19 Jun 2015, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > We've never figured out the magic trick to make irq vs. seqno > > updates coherent, only tricks to make it work. And since > > > > commit 094f9a54e35500739da185cdb78f2e92fc379458 > > Author

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Officially give up on seqno coherency

On Fri, 19 Jun 2015, Daniel Vetter wrote: > We've never figured out the magic trick to make irq vs. seqno > updates coherent, only tricks to make it work. And since > > commit 094f9a54e35500739da185cdb78f2e92fc379458 > Author: Chris Wilson > Date: Wed Sep 25 17:34:55 2013 +0100 > > drm/i915

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Officially give up on seqno coherency

On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 09:16:09PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > We've never figured out the magic trick to make irq vs. seqno > updates coherent, only tricks to make it work. And since > > commit 094f9a54e35500739da185cdb78f2e92fc379458 > Author: Chris Wilson > Date: Wed Sep 25 17:34:55 2013 +

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Officially give up on seqno coherency

We've never figured out the magic trick to make irq vs. seqno updates coherent, only tricks to make it work. And since commit 094f9a54e35500739da185cdb78f2e92fc379458 Author: Chris Wilson Date: Wed Sep 25 17:34:55 2013 +0100 drm/i915: Fix __wait_seqno to use true infinite timeouts we auto

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Officially give up on seqno coherency

On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 06:43:04PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > We've never figured out the magic trick to make irq vs. seqno > updates coherent, only tricks to make it work. And since > > commit 094f9a54e35500739da185cdb78f2e92fc379458 > Author: Chris Wilson > Date: Wed Sep 25 17:34:55 2013 +

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Officially give up on seqno coherency

We've never figured out the magic trick to make irq vs. seqno updates coherent, only tricks to make it work. And since commit 094f9a54e35500739da185cdb78f2e92fc379458 Author: Chris Wilson Date: Wed Sep 25 17:34:55 2013 +0100 drm/i915: Fix __wait_seqno to use true infinite timeouts we auto