Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Reboot CI if we get wedged during driver init

On 01.07.2020 17:17, Chris Wilson wrote: > Quoting Michał Winiarski (2020-07-01 16:07:21) >> From: Michał Winiarski >> >> Getting wedged device on driver init is pretty much unrecoverable. >> Since we're running verious scenarios that may potentially hit this in typo >> CI (module reload / sel

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Reboot CI if we get wedged during driver init

Quoting Michał Winiarski (2020-07-01 16:07:21) > From: Michał Winiarski > > Getting wedged device on driver init is pretty much unrecoverable. > Since we're running verious scenarios that may potentially hit this in > CI (module reload / selftests / hotunplug), and if it happens, it means > that

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Reboot CI if we get wedged during driver init

Quoting Michał Winiarski (2020-07-01 16:07:21) > From: Michał Winiarski > > Getting wedged device on driver init is pretty much unrecoverable. > Since we're running verious scenarios that may potentially hit this in > CI (module reload / selftests / hotunplug), and if it happens, it means > that

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Reboot CI if we get wedged during driver init

From: Michał Winiarski Getting wedged device on driver init is pretty much unrecoverable. Since we're running verious scenarios that may potentially hit this in CI (module reload / selftests / hotunplug), and if it happens, it means that we can't trust any subsequent CI results, we should just ap