Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Replace gen6 semaphore signal table with code

2016-07-21 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 21/07/16 12:56, Dave Gordon wrote: On 21/07/16 10:31, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: From: Tvrtko Ursulin Static table wastes space for invalid combinations and engines which are not supported by Gen6 (legacy semaphores). Replace it with a function devised by Dave Gordon. I have verified that it

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Replace gen6 semaphore signal table with code

2016-07-21 Thread Dave Gordon
On 21/07/16 10:31, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: From: Tvrtko Ursulin Static table wastes space for invalid combinations and engines which are not supported by Gen6 (legacy semaphores). Replace it with a function devised by Dave Gordon. I have verified that it generates the same mappings between mbox

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Replace gen6 semaphore signal table with code

2016-07-21 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 10:31:35AM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > From: Tvrtko Ursulin > > Static table wastes space for invalid combinations and > engines which are not supported by Gen6 (legacy semaphores). > > Replace it with a function devised by Dave Gordon. > > I have verified that it gen

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Replace gen6 semaphore signal table with code

2016-07-21 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
From: Tvrtko Ursulin Static table wastes space for invalid combinations and engines which are not supported by Gen6 (legacy semaphores). Replace it with a function devised by Dave Gordon. I have verified that it generates the same mappings between mbox selectors and signalling registers. Signe