Widawsky;
intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Rework GPU reset sequence
to match driver load thaw
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 08:36:33AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:26:38AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Oh, I guess that's
: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Rework GPU reset sequence
to match driver load thaw
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 08:36:33AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:26:38AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Oh, I guess that's the tricky bit why the old approach never
worked
- because
, July 29, 2014 11:33 AM
To: Chris Wilson; Daniel Vetter; Ben Widawsky; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Rework GPU reset sequence to match
driver load thaw
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 08:36:33AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:26:38AM
GPU reset sequence to match
driver load thaw
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 08:36:33AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:26:38AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Oh, I guess that's the tricky bit why the old approach never worked
- because reset_in_progress is set we failed
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:26:38AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Oh, I guess that's the tricky bit why the old approach never worked -
because reset_in_progress is set we failed the context/ppgtt loading
through the rings and screwed up.
Problem with your approach is that we want to bail out
On Tue, Jul 29, 2014 at 08:36:33AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 11:26:38AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
Oh, I guess that's the tricky bit why the old approach never worked -
because reset_in_progress is set we failed the context/ppgtt loading
through the rings and
@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Rework GPU reset sequence
to match driver load thaw
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 06:05:29PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 04:05:59PM +0100, alistair.mcau...@intel.com wrote:
From: McAulay, Alistair alistair.mcau
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 06:05:29PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 04:05:59PM +0100, alistair.mcau...@intel.com wrote:
From: McAulay, Alistair alistair.mcau...@intel.com
This patch is to address Daniels concerns over different code during reset:
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Rework GPU reset sequence to match
driver load thaw
On Fri, Jul 25, 2014 at 06:05:29PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 04:05:59PM +0100, alistair.mcau...@intel.com wrote:
From: McAulay, Alistair alistair.mcau...@intel.com
,
Alistair.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel Vetter
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 10:27 AM
To: Ben Widawsky
Cc: Mcaulay, Alistair; intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Rework GPU reset sequence
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 04:05:59PM +0100, alistair.mcau...@intel.com wrote:
From: McAulay, Alistair alistair.mcau...@intel.com
This patch is to address Daniels concerns over different code during reset:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2014-June/047758.html
The reason for
From: McAulay, Alistair alistair.mcau...@intel.com
This patch is to address Daniels concerns over different code during reset:
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/intel-gfx/2014-June/047758.html
The reason for aiming as hard as possible to use the exact same code for
driver load, gpu reset
12 matches
Mail list logo
