; > Cc: Intel GFX
> > Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Support 64b execbuf
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 07:29:25PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > > Previously, our code only had a 32b offset value for where the
> > > batchbuffer starts. With full P
> -Original Message-
> From: Intel-gfx [mailto:intel-gfx-boun...@lists.freedesktop.org] On Behalf
> Of Chris Wilson
> Sent: Thursday, May 01, 2014 9:13 AM
> To: Widawsky, Benjamin
> Cc: Intel GFX
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Support 64b execbuf
>
&
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 07:29:25PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> Previously, our code only had a 32b offset value for where the
> batchbuffer starts. With full PPGTT, and 64b canonical GPU address
> space, that is an insufficient value. The code to expand is pretty
> straight forward, and only one p
Previously, our code only had a 32b offset value for where the
batchbuffer starts. With full PPGTT, and 64b canonical GPU address
space, that is an insufficient value. The code to expand is pretty
straight forward, and only one platform needs to do anything with the
extra bits.
Signed-off-by: Ben
