On Thu, May 01, 2014 at 09:04:50AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 05:18:28PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> > All the rest of the code to enable this is in my branch. Without my
> > branch, hitting > 32b offsets is impossible. The code has always
> > "supported" 64b, but it's ne
On Mon, Apr 28, 2014 at 05:18:28PM -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote:
> All the rest of the code to enable this is in my branch. Without my
> branch, hitting > 32b offsets is impossible. The code has always
> "supported" 64b, but it's never actually been run of tested. This change
> doesn't actually fix an
All the rest of the code to enable this is in my branch. Without my
branch, hitting > 32b offsets is impossible. The code has always
"supported" 64b, but it's never actually been run of tested. This change
doesn't actually fix anything. [1] I am not sure why X won't work yet. I
do not get hangs or
