On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 01:37:19PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 09/10/15 13:19, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 01:11:47PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> >>
> >>On 09/10/15 12:51, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >>>If the impossible happens and we fail to rebind a VMA in the middle of
On 09/10/15 13:19, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 01:11:47PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
On 09/10/15 12:51, Chris Wilson wrote:
If the impossible happens and we fail to rebind a VMA in the middle of
rebinding all VMA for an object we currently bail out and leave the
object in an
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 01:11:47PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 09/10/15 12:51, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >If the impossible happens and we fail to rebind a VMA in the middle of
> >rebinding all VMA for an object we currently bail out and leave the
> >object in an inconsistent state. Attempt to
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 01:11:47PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
>
> On 09/10/15 12:51, Chris Wilson wrote:
> >If the impossible happens and we fail to rebind a VMA in the middle of
> >rebinding all VMA for an object we currently bail out and leave the
> >object in an inconsistent state. Attempt to
On 09/10/15 12:51, Chris Wilson wrote:
If the impossible happens and we fail to rebind a VMA in the middle of
rebinding all VMA for an object we currently bail out and leave the
object in an inconsistent state. Attempt to unwind the incomplete update
by reverting all updated VMA back to the orig
If the impossible happens and we fail to rebind a VMA in the middle of
rebinding all VMA for an object we currently bail out and leave the
object in an inconsistent state. Attempt to unwind the incomplete update
by reverting all updated VMA back to the original cache-level, and WARN
if that fails.
