Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Use the engine name directly in the error_state file

On 09/01/18 13:37, Michel Thierry wrote: On 09/01/18 12:46, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Michal Wajdeczko (2018-01-09 20:39:09) On Tue, 09 Jan 2018 20:33:55 +0100, Michel Thierry wrote: Instead of using local string names that we will have to keep maintaining, use

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Use the engine name directly in the error_state file

On 09/01/18 12:46, Chris Wilson wrote: Quoting Michal Wajdeczko (2018-01-09 20:39:09) On Tue, 09 Jan 2018 20:33:55 +0100, Michel Thierry wrote: Instead of using local string names that we will have to keep maintaining, use the engine->name directly. Suggested-by:

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Use the engine name directly in the error_state file

Quoting Michal Wajdeczko (2018-01-09 20:39:09) > On Tue, 09 Jan 2018 20:33:55 +0100, Michel Thierry > wrote: > > > Instead of using local string names that we will have to keep > > maintaining, use the engine->name directly. > > > > Suggested-by: Michal Wajdeczko

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Use the engine name directly in the error_state file

On Tue, 09 Jan 2018 20:33:55 +0100, Michel Thierry wrote: Instead of using local string names that we will have to keep maintaining, use the engine->name directly. Suggested-by: Michal Wajdeczko Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: Use the engine name directly in the error_state file

Instead of using local string names that we will have to keep maintaining, use the engine->name directly. Suggested-by: Michal Wajdeczko Signed-off-by: Michel Thierry Cc: Michal Wajdeczko ---