On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 05:07:55PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> Since active function on VLV immediately activate PSR let's give more
> time for idleness. Different from core platforms where we have idle_frames
> count.
>
> Also kms_psr_sink_crc now is automated and always get this:
>
> [drm:inte
Since active function on VLV immediately activate PSR let's give more
time for idleness. Different from core platforms where we have idle_frames
count.
Also kms_psr_sink_crc now is automated and always get this:
[drm:intel_enable_pipe] enabling pipe A
[drm:intel_edp_backlight_on]
[drm:intel_panel
On Mon, Jul 27, 2015 at 06:37:28PM +, Vivi, Rodrigo wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 10:36 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 04:42:27PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > > Since active function on VLV immediately activate PSR let's give more
> > > time for idleness. Different f
On Mon, 2015-07-27 at 10:36 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 04:42:27PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > Since active function on VLV immediately activate PSR let's give more
> > time for idleness. Different from core platforms where we have idle_frames
> > count.
> >
> > Also k
On Fri, Jul 24, 2015 at 04:42:27PM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> Since active function on VLV immediately activate PSR let's give more
> time for idleness. Different from core platforms where we have idle_frames
> count.
>
> Also kms_psr_sink_crc now is automated and always get this:
>
> [drm:inte
Tested-By: Intel Graphics QA PRTS (Patch Regression Test System Contact:
shuang...@intel.com)
Task id: 6861
-Summary-
Platform Delta drm-intel-nightly Series Applied
ILK
Since active function on VLV immediately activate PSR let's give more
time for idleness. Different from core platforms where we have idle_frames
count.
Also kms_psr_sink_crc now is automated and always get this:
[drm:intel_enable_pipe] enabling pipe A
[drm:intel_edp_backlight_on]
[drm:intel_panel
i, Rodrigo
> Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: VLV/CHV PSR: Increase wait delay
> time before active PSR.
>
> On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 07:38:51AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> > Since active function on VLV immediately activate PSR l
ssage-
From: Daniel Vetter [mailto:daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch] On Behalf Of Daniel Vetter
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2014 10:46 AM
To: Vivi, Rodrigo
Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: VLV/CHV PSR: Increase wait delay
time before active PSR.
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014
On Wed, Nov 19, 2014 at 07:38:51AM -0800, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
> Since active function on VLV immediately activate PSR let's give more
> time for idleness.
>
> v2: Rebase over intel_psr.c and fix typo.
> v3: s/psr/PSR on comment (by Durgadoss)
>
> Reviewed-by: Durgadoss R
> Signed-off-by: Rodrigo
Since active function on VLV immediately activate PSR let's give more
time for idleness.
v2: Rebase over intel_psr.c and fix typo.
v3: s/psr/PSR on comment (by Durgadoss)
Reviewed-by: Durgadoss R
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 7 ++-
1 file changed, 6 in
11 matches
Mail list logo
