Chris Wilson writes:
> When we idle, we wakeup the first waiter (checking to see if it missed
> an earlier wakeup) and disarm the breadcrumbs. However, we now assert
> that there are no waiter when the interrupt is disabled, triggering an
> assert if there were multiple waiters when we idled.
>
>
On Mon, Mar 06, 2017 at 12:30:17PM +0200, Mika Kuoppala wrote:
> Chris Wilson writes:
> > + spin_lock_irq(&b->rb_lock);
> > + rbtree_postorder_for_each_entry_safe(wait, n, &b->waiters, node) {
> > + RB_CLEAR_NODE(&wait->node);
> > + if (wake_up_process(wait->tsk) && wait ==
Chris Wilson writes:
> When we idle, we wakeup the first waiter (checking to see if it missed
> an earlier wakeup) and disarm the breadcrumbs. However, we now assert
> that there are no waiter when the interrupt is disabled, triggering an
> assert if there were multiple waiters when we idled.
>
>
When we idle, we wakeup the first waiter (checking to see if it missed
an earlier wakeup) and disarm the breadcrumbs. However, we now assert
that there are no waiter when the interrupt is disabled, triggering an
assert if there were multiple waiters when we idled.
[ 420.842275] invalid opcode: 00
