With the increasing number of rings,
we probably have more information to print than we were printing.
Cc: Ben Widawsky benjamin.widaw...@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.v...@intel.com
---
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gpu_error.c | 18 ++
1 file changed, 6
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 09:39:55AM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
With the increasing number of rings,
we probably have more information to print than we were printing.
After our discussion were you going to send a new patch?
[snip]
--
Ben Widawsky, Intel Open Source Technology Center
You mean you prefer the the loop with for (i = 0; i hweight(ring_mask); i++)
{
instead? I thought you were ok with either and I preferred this one just to be
on the safest side and let userspace parse it properly.
Or do you prefer that other version with double loop but with names of rings?
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 05:36:52PM -0700, Vivi, Rodrigo wrote:
You mean you prefer the the loop with for (i = 0; i hweight(ring_mask);
i++) {
instead? I thought you were ok with either and I preferred this one just to
be on the safest side and let userspace parse it properly.
I can live
With the increasing number of rings,
we probably have more information to print than we were printing.
v2: Loop only over active rings and print info with ring names.
Cc: Ben Widawsky benjamin.widaw...@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.v...@intel.com
---
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 10:58:17AM -0700, Rodrigo Vivi wrote:
With the increasing number of rings,
we probably have more information to print than we were printing.
v2: Loop only over active rings and print info with ring names.
Cc: Ben Widawsky benjamin.widaw...@intel.com
Signed-off-by:
