On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 6:20 PM, Ville Syrjälä
ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 06:13:15PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote:
pfit_size stores the request mode, which matches crtc-config.requested
2013/5/22 Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com:
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 06:24:38PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
Hi
2013/5/20 Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com:
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 05:13:41PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
From: Paulo Zanoni paulo.r.zan...@intel.com
We
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 12:05:15PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
2013/5/22 Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com:
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 06:24:38PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
Hi
2013/5/20 Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com:
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 05:13:41PM -0300, Paulo
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote:
pfit_size stores the request mode, which matches crtc-config.requested
mode. Instead of jumping through hoops I think I'd be better to directly
use those values ...
Scrap that, I can't read code ;-)
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 06:13:15PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 6:07 PM, Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote:
pfit_size stores the request mode, which matches crtc-config.requested
mode. Instead of jumping through hoops I think I'd be better to directly
use those
On Tue, May 21, 2013 at 06:24:38PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
Hi
2013/5/20 Ville Syrjälä ville.syrj...@linux.intel.com:
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 05:13:41PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
From: Paulo Zanoni paulo.r.zan...@intel.com
We were previously calling sandybridge_update_wm on HSW, but
On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 05:13:41PM -0300, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
From: Paulo Zanoni paulo.r.zan...@intel.com
We were previously calling sandybridge_update_wm on HSW, but the SNB
function didn't really match the HSW specification, so we were just
writing the wrong values. For example, I was not
From: Paulo Zanoni paulo.r.zan...@intel.com
We were previously calling sandybridge_update_wm on HSW, but the SNB
function didn't really match the HSW specification, so we were just
writing the wrong values. For example, I was not seeing any LP
watermark ever enabled.
This patch implements the
From: Paulo Zanoni paulo.r.zan...@intel.com
We were previously calling sandybridge_update_wm on HSW, but the SNB
function didn't really match the HSW specification, so we were just
writing the wrong values. For example, I was not seeing any LP
watermark ever enabled.
So this patch implements the
