Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: unconditionally unlock panel regs

2010-12-15 Thread Jim Gettys
On 12/14/2010 04:15 PM, Jesse Barnes wrote: On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 20:45:14 + Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:17:59 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > In the panel_on function we skip everything if the panel is already > > powered up. However, if it's powered up but not unlo

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: unconditionally unlock panel regs

2010-12-14 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 20:45:14 + Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:17:59 -0800, Jesse Barnes > wrote: > > In the panel_on function we skip everything if the panel is already > > powered up. However, if it's powered up but not unlocked, subsequent > > register writes may fail. > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: unconditionally unlock panel regs

2010-12-14 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 12:17:59 -0800, Jesse Barnes wrote: > In the panel_on function we skip everything if the panel is already > powered up. However, if it's powered up but not unlocked, subsequent > register writes may fail. > > So unlock the regs regardless of the panel state to allow other mo

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] drm/i915: unconditionally unlock panel regs

2010-12-14 Thread Jesse Barnes
In the panel_on function we skip everything if the panel is already powered up. However, if it's powered up but not unlocked, subsequent register writes may fail. So unlock the regs regardless of the panel state to allow other mode setting programming to occur normally. [Still waiting to hear fr