On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:07:43AM +0100, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
> On 12/04/16 17:07, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 01:51:02PM +0100, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
> >>On 12/04/16 12:57, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >>>On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 02:43:39PM +0100, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
> >>
On 12/04/16 17:07, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 01:51:02PM +0100, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
On 12/04/16 12:57, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 02:43:39PM +0100, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
Color management properties are a bit of an odd use case because
they're not mar
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 01:51:02PM +0100, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
> On 12/04/16 12:57, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 02:43:39PM +0100, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
> >>Color management properties are a bit of an odd use case because
> >>they're not marked as atomic properties. Curren
On 12/04/16 12:57, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 02:43:39PM +0100, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
Color management properties are a bit of an odd use case because
they're not marked as atomic properties. Currently we're not updating
the non atomic values so the drm_crtc_state is out of
On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 02:43:39PM +0100, Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
> Color management properties are a bit of an odd use case because
> they're not marked as atomic properties. Currently we're not updating
> the non atomic values so the drm_crtc_state is out of sync with the
> values stored in the
On Mon, 11 Apr 2016 14:43:39 +0100
Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
> Color management properties are a bit of an odd use case because
> they're not marked as atomic properties. Currently we're not updating
> the non atomic values so the drm_crtc_state is out of sync with the
> values stored in the crtc
Color management properties are a bit of an odd use case because
they're not marked as atomic properties. Currently we're not updating
the non atomic values so the drm_crtc_state is out of sync with the
values stored in the crtc object.
v2: Update non atomic values only if commit succeeds (Bob Paa
Op 11-04-16 om 12:37 schreef Lionel Landwerlin:
> Color management properties are a bit of an odd use case because
> they're not marked as atomic properties. Currently we're not updating
> the non atomic values so the drm_crtc_state is out of sync with the
> values stored in the crtc object.
>
> v2
Color management properties are a bit of an odd use case because
they're not marked as atomic properties. Currently we're not updating
the non atomic values so the drm_crtc_state is out of sync with the
values stored in the crtc object.
v2: Update non atomic values only if commit succeeds (Bob Paa
On Fri, 8 Apr 2016 18:17:51 +0100
Lionel Landwerlin wrote:
> Color management properties are a bit of an odd use case because
> they're not marked as atomic properties. Currently we're not updating
> the non atomic values so the drm_crtc_state is out of sync with the
> values stored in the crtc o
Color management properties are a bit of an odd use case because
they're not marked as atomic properties. Currently we're not updating
the non atomic values so the drm_crtc_state is out of sync with the
values stored in the crtc object.
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst
Cc: Bob Paauwe
Cc:
Signed-off-by: Li
11 matches
Mail list logo
