> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:33:12AM +, Lim, Siew Hoon wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 09:49:21AM +0800, Lim Siew Hoon wrote:
> > > > The assert check for c->bo should be done before DBG, else it will
> > > > hit memory access violation when c->bo is null.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 10:33:12AM +, Lim, Siew Hoon wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 09:49:21AM +0800, Lim Siew Hoon wrote:
> > > The assert check for c->bo should be done before DBG, else it will hit
> > > memory access violation when c->bo is null.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Lim Siew
>
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 09:49:21AM +0800, Lim Siew Hoon wrote:
> > The assert check for c->bo should be done before DBG, else it will hit
> > memory access violation when c->bo is null.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Lim Siew Hoon
> > Reviewed-by: Matt Roper
>
> Pardon? With a r-b?
What is a r-b?
On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 09:49:21AM +0800, Lim Siew Hoon wrote:
> The assert check for c->bo should be done before DBG,
> else it will hit memory access violation when c->bo
> is null.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lim Siew Hoon
> Reviewed-by: Matt Roper
Pardon? With a r-b?
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel
The assert check for c->bo should be done before DBG,
else it will hit memory access violation when c->bo
is null.
Signed-off-by: Lim Siew Hoon
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper
Signed-off-by: Matt Roper
---
src/sna/sna_dri2.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/src/sna/s
