Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] xdrm/i915: Respect HW RC6 states availability

2012-10-26 Thread Chris Wilson
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 22:31:01 -0700, Ben Widawsky wrote: > Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > I like the direction this patch is going but I think it does limit > people with knowledge might want to do (for instance, I ran with rc6 > on ILK just fine for quite a while). > > How about we use add_taint instead,

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH] xdrm/i915: Respect HW RC6 states availability

2012-10-25 Thread Ben Widawsky
On Wed, 24 Oct 2012 20:05:15 -0200 Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > If Hardware doesn't allow RC6p or RC6pp we shall avoid end users > turning them on, falling back to the only RC6 deepness available. > > v2: fixed "if" comparison pointed by Chris Wilson > For future reference, putting "v2" in the title

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH] xdrm/i915: Respect HW RC6 states availability

2012-10-24 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
If Hardware doesn't allow RC6p or RC6pp we shall avoid end users turning them on, falling back to the only RC6 deepness available. v2: fixed "if" comparison pointed by Chris Wilson Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 del