Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH -next 1/2] drm/i915: restore FDI link rate on sandybridge

2010-10-13 Thread Zhenyu Wang
On 2010.10.13 09:00:37 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > > So this gets the display working again with current bits? > No, these two are the fixes coming out during my bisect, as it looks we have multiple regression commits... -- Open Source Technology Center, Intel ltd. $gpg --keyserver wwwkeys.p

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH -next 1/2] drm/i915: restore FDI link rate on sandybridge

2010-10-13 Thread Chris Wilson
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 09:00:37 -0700, Jesse Barnes wrote: > On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:40:11 +0800 > Zhenyu Wang wrote: > > > FDI_PLL_BIOS_0 register is for Ironlake only, don't apply to Sandybridge. The VPN ate the response that I've applied both of these, with a tweak to this patch to move the if

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH -next 1/2] drm/i915: restore FDI link rate on sandybridge

2010-10-13 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Wed, 13 Oct 2010 16:40:11 +0800 Zhenyu Wang wrote: > FDI_PLL_BIOS_0 register is for Ironlake only, don't apply to Sandybridge. > > Signed-off-by: Zhenyu Wang > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |5 - > 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drive

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH -next 1/2] drm/i915: restore FDI link rate on sandybridge

2010-10-13 Thread Zhenyu Wang
FDI_PLL_BIOS_0 register is for Ironlake only, don't apply to Sandybridge. Signed-off-by: Zhenyu Wang --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c |5 - 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_display.c