Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] Reduce the time for which 'struct_mutex' is held

2015-08-27 Thread Ankitprasad Sharma
On Wed, 2015-08-26 at 11:25 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 05:28:13PM +0530, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com > wrote: > > From: Ankitprasad Sharma > > > > We are trying to reduce the time for which the global 'struct_mutex' > > is locked. Execbuffer ioctl is one place where

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] Reduce the time for which 'struct_mutex' is held

2015-08-26 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 05:28:13PM +0530, ankitprasad.r.sha...@intel.com wrote: > From: Ankitprasad Sharma > > We are trying to reduce the time for which the global 'struct_mutex' > is locked. Execbuffer ioctl is one place where it is generally held > for the longest time. And sometimes because o

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/3] Reduce the time for which 'struct_mutex' is held

2015-08-24 Thread ankitprasad . r . sharma
From: Ankitprasad Sharma We are trying to reduce the time for which the global 'struct_mutex' is locked. Execbuffer ioctl is one place where it is generally held for the longest time. And sometimes because of this occasional glitches/flickers are observed in 60 fps playback (due to miss of V-bla