On Friday 25 July 2014 02:13 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 09:53:38AM +, Gupta, Sourab wrote:
On Sun, 2014-07-06 at 18:29 +0530, sourab gupta wrote:
On Fri, 2014-06-20 at 10:02 +, Gupta, Sourab wrote:
From: Sourab Gupta
This patch series introduces a new gem creat
On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 09:53:38AM +, Gupta, Sourab wrote:
> On Sun, 2014-07-06 at 18:29 +0530, sourab gupta wrote:
> > On Fri, 2014-06-20 at 10:02 +, Gupta, Sourab wrote:
> > > From: Sourab Gupta
> > >
> > > This patch series introduces a new gem create ioctl for user specified
> > > pla
On Sun, 2014-07-06 at 18:29 +0530, sourab gupta wrote:
> On Fri, 2014-06-20 at 10:02 +, Gupta, Sourab wrote:
> > From: Sourab Gupta
> >
> > This patch series introduces a new gem create ioctl for user specified
> > placement.
> >
> > Despite being a unified memory architecture (UMA) some bit
On Fri, 2014-06-20 at 10:02 +, Gupta, Sourab wrote:
> From: Sourab Gupta
>
> This patch series introduces a new gem create ioctl for user specified
> placement.
>
> Despite being a unified memory architecture (UMA) some bits of memory
> are more equal than others. In particular we have the t
From: Sourab Gupta
This patch series introduces a new gem create ioctl for user specified
placement.
Despite being a unified memory architecture (UMA) some bits of memory
are more equal than others. In particular we have the thorny issue of
stolen memory, memory stolen from the system by the BIO
