On 7/18/2014 7:00 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 02:04:56PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 04:53:34PM +0530, Jindal, Sonika wrote:
On 7/18/2014 4:26 PM, Damien Lespiau wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:04:03AM +0530, sonika.jin...@intel.com wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:04:03AM +0530, sonika.jin...@intel.com wrote:
From: Sonika Jindal sonika.jin...@intel.com
This series prepares future platform enabling by changing HAS_PCH_SPLIT to
more
appropriate check since the code accessed may not have anything to do with
having PCH or not.
On 7/18/2014 4:26 PM, Damien Lespiau wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:04:03AM +0530, sonika.jin...@intel.com wrote:
From: Sonika Jindal sonika.jin...@intel.com
This series prepares future platform enabling by changing HAS_PCH_SPLIT to more
appropriate check since the code accessed may not
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 04:53:34PM +0530, Jindal, Sonika wrote:
On 7/18/2014 4:26 PM, Damien Lespiau wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:04:03AM +0530, sonika.jin...@intel.com wrote:
From: Sonika Jindal sonika.jin...@intel.com
This series prepares future platform enabling by changing
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 02:04:56PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 04:53:34PM +0530, Jindal, Sonika wrote:
On 7/18/2014 4:26 PM, Damien Lespiau wrote:
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:04:03AM +0530, sonika.jin...@intel.com wrote:
From: Sonika Jindal
From: Sonika Jindal sonika.jin...@intel.com
This series prepares future platform enabling by changing HAS_PCH_SPLIT to more
appropriate check since the code accessed may not have anything to do with
having PCH or not.
Sonika Jindal (7):
drm/i915: Allowing changing of wm latencies for other
