Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] Future preparation patches

2014-07-20 Thread Jindal, Sonika
On 7/18/2014 7:00 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 02:04:56PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 04:53:34PM +0530, Jindal, Sonika wrote: On 7/18/2014 4:26 PM, Damien Lespiau wrote: On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:04:03AM +0530, sonika.jin...@intel.com wrote: F

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] Future preparation patches

2014-07-18 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 02:04:56PM +0100, Damien Lespiau wrote: > On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 04:53:34PM +0530, Jindal, Sonika wrote: > > > > > > On 7/18/2014 4:26 PM, Damien Lespiau wrote: > > >On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:04:03AM +0530, sonika.jin...@intel.com wrote: > > >>From: Sonika Jindal > > >>

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] Future preparation patches

2014-07-18 Thread Damien Lespiau
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 04:53:34PM +0530, Jindal, Sonika wrote: > > > On 7/18/2014 4:26 PM, Damien Lespiau wrote: > >On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:04:03AM +0530, sonika.jin...@intel.com wrote: > >>From: Sonika Jindal > >> > >>This series prepares future platform enabling by changing HAS_PCH_SPLIT t

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] Future preparation patches

2014-07-18 Thread Jindal, Sonika
On 7/18/2014 4:26 PM, Damien Lespiau wrote: On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:04:03AM +0530, sonika.jin...@intel.com wrote: From: Sonika Jindal This series prepares future platform enabling by changing HAS_PCH_SPLIT to more appropriate check since the code accessed may not have anything to do with

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] Future preparation patches

2014-07-18 Thread Damien Lespiau
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 11:04:03AM +0530, sonika.jin...@intel.com wrote: > From: Sonika Jindal > > This series prepares future platform enabling by changing HAS_PCH_SPLIT to > more > appropriate check since the code accessed may not have anything to do with > having PCH or not. Hi Sonika, HAS_

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] Future preparation patches

2014-07-17 Thread sonika . jindal
From: Sonika Jindal This series prepares future platform enabling by changing HAS_PCH_SPLIT to more appropriate check since the code accessed may not have anything to do with having PCH or not. Sonika Jindal (7): drm/i915: Allowing changing of wm latencies for other valid platforms drm/i915: