Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] drm/i915/dsi: stop using drm_panel, refactor

2017-03-07 Thread Jani Nikula
On Mon, 06 Mar 2017, Jani Nikula wrote: > This is pretty natural continuation to what Hans started. We haven't > made use of the drm_panel framework much at all, and there's no need in > sight, really. It was good for ensuring a certain amount of separation > between the core and the VBT stuff. Le

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] drm/i915/dsi: stop using drm_panel, refactor

2017-03-06 Thread Bob Paauwe
On Mon, 6 Mar 2017 16:31:23 +0200 Jani Nikula wrote: > This is pretty natural continuation to what Hans started. We haven't > made use of the drm_panel framework much at all, and there's no need in > sight, really. It was good for ensuring a certain amount of separation > between the core and the

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] drm/i915/dsi: stop using drm_panel, refactor

2017-03-06 Thread Hans de Goede
Hi, On 06-03-17 15:31, Jani Nikula wrote: This is pretty natural continuation to what Hans started. We haven't made use of the drm_panel framework much at all, and there's no need in sight, really. It was good for ensuring a certain amount of separation between the core and the VBT stuff. Let's

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 0/7] drm/i915/dsi: stop using drm_panel, refactor

2017-03-06 Thread Jani Nikula
This is pretty natural continuation to what Hans started. We haven't made use of the drm_panel framework much at all, and there's no need in sight, really. It was good for ensuring a certain amount of separation between the core and the VBT stuff. Let's keep things that way, but without the interfa