On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 1:19 PM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:39:52AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> Patch 17: Should be tested by someone else with a gt3. Who has one?
>
> More missing mails, I haven't got the patch to comment on, so bare with
> me.
No problem... it seems I'l
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:39:52AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Patch 17: Should be tested by someone else with a gt3. Who has one?
More missing mails, I haven't got the patch to comment on, so bare with
me.
The title and changelog is misleading, this is not about enabling Lower
Slice at all.
S
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Thanks for doing this Rodrigo. Review plan:
>
> Patches 1-4: Damien
> Patch 5: Some bikeshed pending from earlier review ...
> Patch 6-7: Atm in limbo, I've thought they're merged into the x86 tree
> already.
> Patch 8: Ville
> Patch 9-11: R
On Tue, Aug 27, 2013 at 11:39:52AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Thanks for doing this Rodrigo. Review plan:
Please when doing these summaries, include the patch titles.
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
___
Intel-gfx mailing
Thanks for doing this Rodrigo. Review plan:
Patches 1-4: Damien
Patch 5: Some bikeshed pending from earlier review ...
Patch 6-7: Atm in limbo, I've thought they're merged into the x86 tree already.
Patch 8: Ville
Patch 9-11: Rodrigo
Patch 12: lalala ;-)
Patch 13: I guess this can wait until we al
Hi all,
Let me introduce drm-intel-collector branch:
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/~vivijim/drm-intel/log/?h=drm-intel-collector
To describe drm-intel-collector I'll quote Daniel:
"The overall idea is to make sure that simple patches don't get lost.
Bigger patch series or feature work tends to not
