From: Paulo Zanoni
Hi
This is a follow up to "ILK+ interrupt improvements, v3", which was reveiwed by
Ben.
The biggest difference is that patch 20 was squashed into the previous patch, so
different patches received different chunks of patch 20. This caused the need to
rebase pretty much every p
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 7:07 AM, Jani Nikula
wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Jan 2014, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> Just figured I'll comment on these two issues, patches themselves look
>> really nice \o/
>
> Look nice they do, but it also makes me a little sad that neither git
> grep nor my source code tagging
On Wed, 22 Jan 2014, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Just figured I'll comment on these two issues, patches themselves look
> really nice \o/
Look nice they do, but it also makes me a little sad that neither git
grep nor my source code tagging system will no longer find where the
registers are accessed. T
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 05:52:18PM -0200, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
> From: Paulo Zanoni
>
> Hi
>
> Back in July 2013 I sent an email asking about interrupts and suggesting ways
> to
> improve our code [0]. Based on those discussions, I submitted a patch series
> proposing some changes [1]. I receive
From: Paulo Zanoni
Hi
Back in July 2013 I sent an email asking about interrupts and suggesting ways to
improve our code [0]. Based on those discussions, I submitted a patch series
proposing some changes [1]. I received some reviews and the general idea was
accepted, but due to priority changes I
