Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/31] Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v8

2016-07-19 Thread Minchan Kim
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 05:34:05AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 10:37:03AM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > > > The reason we have zone-based reclaim is that we used to have > > > large highmem zones in common configurations and it was necessary > > > to quickly find ZONE_NORMAL

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/31] Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v8

2016-07-19 Thread Minchan Kim
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 10:55:09AM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote: > On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 05:04:12PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > > > > How big ratio between highmem:lowmem do you think a problem? > > > > > > > > > > That's a "how long is a piece of string" type question. The ratio does > > > not

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 00/31] Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v8

2016-07-19 Thread Mel Gorman
On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 05:04:12PM +0900, Minchan Kim wrote: > > > How big ratio between highmem:lowmem do you think a problem? > > > > > > > That's a "how long is a piece of string" type question. The ratio does > > not matter as much as whether the workload is both under memory pressure > >