> Rodrigo ; dan...@ffwll.ch
> Subject: RE: [Intel-gfx][PATCH 01/10] drm/i915: Add i915 device based
> MISSING_CASE macro
>
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2020, "Laxminarayan Bharadiya, Pankaj"
>wrote:
> > Hi Chris,
> >
> >> -Original Message-
>
gt;> ; Vivi, Rodrigo
>> ; dan...@ffwll.ch; dri-de...@lists.freedesktop.org;
>> intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org; jani.nik...@linux.intel.com
>> Cc: Laxminarayan Bharadiya, Pankaj
>>
>> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx][PATCH 01/10] drm/i915: Add i915 device based
>> MISSING_CASE
reedesktop.org; jani.nik...@linux.intel.com
> Cc: Laxminarayan Bharadiya, Pankaj
>
> Subject: Re: [Intel-gfx][PATCH 01/10] drm/i915: Add i915 device based
> MISSING_CASE macro
>
> Quoting Pankaj Bharadiya (2020-02-25 13:47:00)
> > Now that we have struct drm_device based drm_W
Quoting Pankaj Bharadiya (2020-02-25 13:47:00)
> Now that we have struct drm_device based drm_WARN, introduce struct
> drm_i915_private based i915_MISSING_CASE macro which uses drm_WARN so
> that device specific information will also get printed in backtrace.
>
> i915_MISSING_CASE macro should be
Now that we have struct drm_device based drm_WARN, introduce struct
drm_i915_private based i915_MISSING_CASE macro which uses drm_WARN so
that device specific information will also get printed in backtrace.
i915_MISSING_CASE macro should be preferred over MISSING_CASE,
wherever possible.
Signed-o