On Monday, August 12, 2019 10:23:29 PM CEST Daniele Ceraolo Spurio wrote:
>
> On 8/12/19 6:38 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Since execlista and the guc have diverged in their port tracking, we
> > cannot simply reuse the execlists cancellation code as it leads to
> > unbalanced reference counting.
On 8/12/19 6:38 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
Since execlista and the guc have diverged in their port tracking, we
cannot simply reuse the execlists cancellation code as it leads to
unbalanced reference counting. Use a local simpler routine for the guc.
LGTM, just wondering if we should put a
Since execlista and the guc have diverged in their port tracking, we
cannot simply reuse the execlists cancellation code as it leads to
unbalanced reference counting. Use a local simpler routine for the guc.
Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson
Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio
---
