Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/20] drm/amdgpu: Introduce GEM object functions

2020-09-14 Thread Christian König
Am 14.09.20 um 17:05 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann: Hi Am 13.08.20 um 12:22 schrieb Christian König: Am 13.08.20 um 10:36 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann: GEM object functions deprecate several similar callback interfaces in struct drm_driver. This patch replaces the per-driver callbacks with per-instan

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/20] drm/amdgpu: Introduce GEM object functions

2020-09-14 Thread Thomas Zimmermann
Hi Am 13.08.20 um 12:22 schrieb Christian König: > Am 13.08.20 um 10:36 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann: >> GEM object functions deprecate several similar callback interfaces in >> struct drm_driver. This patch replaces the per-driver callbacks with >> per-instance callbacks in amdgpu. The only exceptio

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/20] drm/amdgpu: Introduce GEM object functions

2020-08-13 Thread Christian König
Am 13.08.20 um 10:36 schrieb Thomas Zimmermann: GEM object functions deprecate several similar callback interfaces in struct drm_driver. This patch replaces the per-driver callbacks with per-instance callbacks in amdgpu. The only exception is gem_prime_mmap, which is non-trivial to convert. Sign

[Intel-gfx] [PATCH 01/20] drm/amdgpu: Introduce GEM object functions

2020-08-13 Thread Thomas Zimmermann
GEM object functions deprecate several similar callback interfaces in struct drm_driver. This patch replaces the per-driver callbacks with per-instance callbacks in amdgpu. The only exception is gem_prime_mmap, which is non-trivial to convert. Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann --- drivers/gpu/drm